Where have all the women gone?

It's a dismal reality when the workplace still cannot accommodate, without penalty, the fact that women have babies. The recent studies by the Law Society of Upper Canada reveal a gender gap in salaries and, even more troubling, the huge sacrifices women make to stay in the game. Turns out they get married less and have fewer children than men in their profession.

No wonder. When women do have chlldren and thus "work-life" issues, they are then perceived with enough wariness by their bosses that, according to a U.S. management journal, they are often passed over for promotion.

What happened to the workplace that was supposed to take families into account? And what became of the men who were to champion these family issues because they understood that equality meant you didn't penalize a gender for a biological function?

No wonder, in law anyway, women are leaving the profession in droves. What a waste of training and education, simply because there are so few at the top (need I say male?) enlightened enough to see that their blinkered view of work is costing them talent and money.

Looking for leadership on the environment

It's disturbing that the government of Canada just isn't taking the needs of its citizens seriously. I'm talking about the environment, such a huge concern, with potential for real crisis. Yet we are one of the laggards at climate discussions, hanging back instead of taking the initiative, our government just not getting that people are ready to act because most of us realize how important this is.

I don't think they see that, apart from the looming environmental disasters that are already in motion, especially in the Canadian north, there is a new business model emerging with the environment at its core.

It's already taking shape. According to research done recently for ECO Canada, b y 2011, environmental employment is expected to reach 573,565—an increase of 8.1%. The national growth rate is estimated at 6.6%, meaning that jobs in the environmental sector are growing at a rate 23% faster than the national average. The provinces with the highest number of environmental employees -- right now they work in public administration; mining and oil and gas extraction; waste management; agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting; manufacturing --

are Ontario (42.5%), B.C. (17.6%) and Quebec (17.3%).

And there's much more to come. Because at this point most companies are considering the environment in some way, unheard of a decade ago. Restaurants are thinking about waste, hotels about water usage, and most businesses are turning off lights, recycling paper products, etc. In just the next two years, studies project, there will be a 14% increase in jobs in the air quality sector, 10% in restoration and reclamation, 8% in research and development and 7% in natural resource management.

We are moving ahead, growing new jobs, concerned about the environment in most areas of our lives. Maybe the Canadian government needs to learn a lesson from its citizens.

As the world turns

Research for the story on the business of food really clarifies how small the world has become for all of us compared to even a decade ago. Now it makes sense that the George Brown School in Toronto is working with a city in China to train chefs or with a culinary school in India, adding to its more traditional international relationship with Italy and France. We can talk about, read about and in most major cities we can even try Brazilian food and Tunisian food, among many other types of cuisine, in this shrinking world of ours.

And I was struck during my viewing of the film Julie & Julia how much like a dream the life of Julia Child seemed, with her entree into the male world of the Cordon Bleu School after dallying about taking hat-making courses or entertaining her husband's friends. How old-fashioned.

On the other hand, Julie's world was so much easier to understand: the frustrating job, answering the phone in her work pod decorated with various tokens of her hopes and dreams, lunching with friends who spent half their time on their blackberries and cell phones. She did quite spontaneously what many a job counsellor would have advised her to do -- she began to work on something she loved. Which brought her back to Julia and the Art of French Cooking and those life-changing 365 days when she tried each recipe.

This New York section of the film has been criticized as being too dark, too boring. To me, this was so much closer to reality than those lovely moments when Julia Child meandered into her first book deal. Good for Julia, and how wonderful for Julie that she lived a life we recognize and found her own pot of gold, courtesy of the blogosphere.

Tappers and listeners

I've been writing about the workplace for more than five years now, checking out new studies, reports, books and interviewing people in high tech and low tech jobs, scrambling to be creative in a topsy-turvy environment or glowing with success because they were in the right place at the right time with the right skill set. So much goes on here and so much needs to be said.

Here's one idea.

In any workplace, communication is critical. That's the opinion of brothers Chip and Dan Heath, a couple of writers worth attention -- one is a professor of organizational behaviour at Stanford University, the other a consultant at Duke Corporate Education. They also write for Fast Company magazine and have authored a book about getting your ideas across.

These are "ideas that stick" but one of the biggest problems with developing them is what the Heaths call “the curse of knowledge.”

It’s beautifully illustrated by a study done in 1990 by Stanford PhD student Elizabeth Newton using a simple game in which she assigned people to be tappers – they tapped out assigned songs like Happy Birthday to You by knocking on a table – and other people to be listeners, who were to guess the song, based on the rhythm being tapped. Over the course of Newton's experiment, 120 songs were tapped out.

Before they got the score, Newton’s tappers predicted that the odds were 50 per cent the song would be guessed correctly. In reality, instead of getting the song one time in two, the listeners got them one time in 40. Listeners guessed only 2.5 percent of the songs.

The discrepancy, Newton realized, was that the tapper is hearing the song in her head. The listener is only hearing tap-tap-tap.

For the tapper, the song is obvious. She can’t believe the listener is so stupid. That’s because she can’t imagine what it’s like not to hear the song.

This is the curse of knowledge, and this experiment is reenacted every day across the world, write the Heaths. “The tappers and listeners are CEOs and frontline employees, teachers and students, politicians and voters, marketers and customers, writers and readers.

Unless you pay attention, the smarter you get at something, the harder it is to communicate.